World Spanking Forums SpankedCoeds.com
Go Back   World Spanking Forums > General Posts > General Discussion
World Spanking Forums FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Sidebar Off

  #1  
Old 01-28-2006, 05:33 AM
Wrestler24 Wrestler24 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 41
Default Spanking young girls

Perhaps this should be posted with Maternal Spankings, but it is a bit off topic. I do have a question. Of all the types of spanking material to be found, what most appeals to me are stories and drawings of girls being spanked by their mothers. In Laura's Spanking Corner, Carolina Jim writes excellent stories about teenage girls--some as young as 14--receiving severe bare bottom spankings from the mothers. The drawings of Sassi Bottoms feature the same. And often the girls being spanked are pre-adolescent. So my question is: Am I viewing child pornography when I read these stories and view these drawings? One more thing: I was spanked as a youngster. And, yes, it was by my mother. Hmmmmm. Thoughts out there?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2006, 06:18 AM
2hot2sit 2hot2sit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,132
Default

In my opinion the answer is yes.
As you were spanked as a youngster tell us about your experiences and I can assure you there are others who will be interested.
----------------2hot2sit---------------------
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2006, 10:07 AM
Victoria Wood's Avatar
Victoria Wood Victoria Wood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,435
Default

I'm not sure the answer is yes. Child porn is wrong b/c it misuses children. Drawings and stories do not involve actual children. I'm not sure drawings and stories are even pornography. They may be better classified as erotica.

I also think that being turned on by depictions of children being spanked is substantively different from wanting to have sex with children (pedophilia).

So I wouldn't take the leap to saying it's like child pornography.
__________________
Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2006, 10:09 AM
mark snow mark snow is offline
The Stinger
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,004
Send a message via Yahoo to mark snow
Default

Hard for me to say. So I won't put my spin on this one:angel:
__________________
Down with your panties young lady.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2006, 10:49 AM
Kinky_Man Kinky_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 301
Default

Lolicon is considered perfectly acceptable when it is featured in the realm of drawings.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-28-2006, 02:54 PM
Romola Romola is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Default

Drawings of children being spanked wouldn't be considered as child pornography in the UK, but 'pseudo-photographs' might and it's an offence to view them, punishable by prison sentences and permanent listing on the sex offenders register! That would include pictures that were photoshopped to look like a child was involved AND pictures that were actually of adults who look like children. In my view, the harm of actual child pornography is that real children are harmed in order to make it. This obviously does not apply to pictures not really involving children, no matter how realistic.
Even worse, the government proposes to make it an offence to look at 'pseudo-photographs' or 'realistic depictions' of sexual violence involving adults, even where the adults are actually consenting.
__________________
Hello Americish!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2006, 03:33 PM
Kinky_Man Kinky_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 301
Default

Is the argument that psuedo photographs can easily involve real children?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-28-2006, 03:45 PM
Romola Romola is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kinky_Man
Is the argument that psuedo photographs can easily involve real children?

It seems not - even if the pic has a completely created face, if it looks like a pic of a child being abused, its an offence to possess it. I see where you're coming from, if someone took an innocent pic of an actual child and shopped it to look like something else was happening, that would be pretty nasty, but the child pornography legislation and the proposed laws for 'violent pornography' go much wider than that.
__________________
Hello Americish!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-28-2006, 03:48 PM
Victoria Wood's Avatar
Victoria Wood Victoria Wood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,435
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kinky_Man
Is the argument that psuedo photographs can easily involve real children?


My friend in the child abuse field makes that argument. How do you know if it's a real child or not? Also, pedophiles can use the synthetic pictures to help them groom children for sex.

And of course, there is the desire to persecute pedophiles and make sure that they don't have access to anything that they desire. The idea of child molestation is loathsome, so don't allow pictures even if they are fabricated.
__________________
Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-28-2006, 03:50 PM
Romola Romola is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Default

That's the thinking behind the legislation and I can see some logic in it where children are involved. However, even if you could prove that the subject was actually an adult and fully consented, that wouldn't be a defence under the present laws. Again, the point about the possibility of using the pic to groom children is a fair one, but the proposed act covers material where the subjects are adults but appear to be being assaulted or abused, even if that adult subsequently stands ina witness box and testifies that they consented.
__________________
Hello Americish!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Portal By vbPortal Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, phpPortals. All Rights Reserved.
© 2008 Alpine Entertainment Group, Inc.